My Research:
3. Star Cluster Systems
Preamble
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a44e0/a44e034f6798b11f135df3d7271264f4a08a4228" alt="The globular clusters Palomar 5 and M3 on the same scale
(SDSS)"
The work presented in this section was done with my past and present graduate students and postdocs Katharina Glatt, Andreas Koch, Geneviève Parmentier, Frederik Schönebeck, Fayezeh Shabani, and Carolin Wittmann.
Subtopics
- 3.1 Globular Cluster Systems of Massive Galaxies
- 3.2 Globular Clusters in Dwarf Galaxies
- 3.3 The Recent Star Formation History of the Magellanic Clouds from Star Clusters
- 3.4 Young Massive Clusters in Star-Forming Galaxies
3.1 Globular Cluster Systems of Massive Galaxies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f1325/f1325f64696d45891524ce2c4be82b1283467e42" alt="The globular cluster system
of the elliptical galaxy NGC 4636"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6f080/6f0808614f89c6ac2717093b57e81aa82bbdbdea" alt="The radial mass density
profile of the old halo globular cluster system in the Milky Way
(Parmentier & Grebel 2005)"
We found the elliptical galaxy NGC 1404 in the Fornax galaxy cluster to have a comparatively low globular cluster specific frequency. We interpreted this as well as its unsually high radial velocity and high X-ray luminosity as evidence for recent infall into the cluster (Richtler et al. 1992). Our kinematic studies of the globulars around the dominant elliptical in Fornax, NGC 1399, revealed that its red globular cluster system has a lower velocity dispersion than its blue globular clusters (Dirsch et al. 2004; Richtler et al. 2004). Globular clusters have repeatedly been used as dynamical tracers of the underlying galactic mass distribution. For NGC 1399, we found that its dark halo potential can be well-reproduced by a logarithmic potential or by a Navarro, Frenk, & White (1997) profile (Richtler et al. 2004). A wide-field imaging study of the central 0.5 square degrees of the Fornax cluster allowed us to investigate the large-scale distribution of globular clusters in this galaxy cluster (D'Abrusco et al. 2016). We found that the spatial distribution of the globular clusters connects NGC 1399 to its neighboring giant ellipticals, which may imply that NGC 1399 stripped globular clusters from its neighbors. Red globular clusters tend to be more spatially concentrated around the loci of the ellipticals and show relatively small-scale density structures possibly caused by galaxy-galaxy interactions. On the other hand, blue globulars show a much more spatially extended distribution and may have been removed from the halos of massive galaxies in the core of Fornax by this galaxy cluster's substantial gravitational potential (D'Abrusco et al. 2016).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/746d8/746d838a5dec805c8a37a0662d9818e62b72e796" alt="The distribution of red and blue globular clusters in the Fornax
galaxy cluster (D'Abrusco et al. 2016)"
3.2 Globular Clusters in Dwarf Galaxies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/70ae8/70ae8910cd8a1dba8dbdedee2b8b92f63fec360b" alt="Color-magnitude diagram of the
globular cluster NGC 121 in the SMC with Dartmouth isochrones
(Glatt et al. 2008)."
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ebe7/9ebe7ef01cb77ab45edf74c96c42d77f604667d0" alt="The globular cluster GC1 in the
Sculptor group dwarf elliptical galaxy Scl-dE1 (Da Costa et al.
2009)"
We discovered one of the most extended globular clusters known in a dwarf galaxy in the dwarf elliptical Scl-dE1 in the Sculptor group (Da Costa et al. 2009). While luminous, compact globular clusters typically have half-light radii around 3 pc, this globular cluster Scl-dE1 GC1 has an effective radius of 22 pc. Evaluating the known half-light radii of globular clusters in dwarf galaxies, we find their distribution to be bimodal, including a substantial contribution from extended globular clusters. When considering data of globular clusters in massive galaxies (the Milky Way, M31, and Centaurus A) the fraction of globular clusters with small half-light radii strongly increases, but the overall distribution remains bimodal despite tidal effects that presumably destroyed many of the extended clusters that once formed at shorter galactocentric distances (see figure below; Da Costa et al. 2009). Due to this persistent dichotomy in half-light radii, we suggest that there may be two modes of globular cluster formation with the extended cluster mode (and the survival of such clusters) being more common in environments with lower tidal forces such as dwarf galaxies. In contrast, high-pressure environments such as massive galaxies form preferentially globular clusters with small effective radii (Da Costa et al. 2009).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/03f2c/03f2c6c03267ae493485ee57fcd99145ff2ab1cf" alt="Bimodal distribution of globular cluster half-light radii
in dwarf and massive galaxies
(Da Costa et al. 2009)."
3.3 The Recent Star Formation History of the Magellanic Clouds from Star Clusters
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d76b8/d76b86e2dd3f4da1083e58c9271c43d388a23206" alt="LMC and SMC young cluster age distribution"
In the framework of the Magellanic Clouds Photometric Survey (MCPS; Zaritsky et al. 2002, 2004), we carried out a multi-color CCD drift scan survey of the central 64 deg² of the Large Magellanic Cloud (LMC) and of the central 18 deg² of the Small Magellanic Cloud (SMC). Using the resulting point-source photometry catalogs, my graduate student Katharina Glatt age-dated 1193 populous star clusters in the LMC and 324 SMC clusters via isochrone fits to their resolved color-magnitude diagrams (Glatt, Grebel, & Koch 2010).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/dacd5/dacd5fb9cf1da99a555b7f1b91fe4e4e6ed2c75f" alt="Recent SMC star formation history based on its star
clusters"
In the SMC, clusters younger than about 15 Myr are located along the bar, particularly toward the eastern and western rims of the HI supershells 37A and 304A. Clusters with ages of about 16 to 60 Myr are still concentrated around the bar with some outliers in the SMC wing. In the age range of 60 to 300 Myr, clusters are seen throughout the main body and the northern part of the SMC. The oldest age-dated clusters with ages between 300 Myr to 1 Gyr populate mainly the western part of the SMC's main body (Glatt et al. 2010).
In the LMC, clusters younger than 20 Myr are mainly found in the 30 Doradus region, in supershells LMC 3, 4, 8 (especially along the rims), in many of the giant shells, and in the western part of the bar. For ages of 20 to 50 Myr, the star clusters are more widely distributed across 30 Dor, LMC 3, 4, 5, 8, and many giant shells. Also, they are scattered throughout the western part of the LMC and show an increased concentration along the western and central parts of the bar. In the age range of 50 to 100 Myr, the cluster distribution resembles a slightly tilted capital Greek Θ with a high concentration of clusters in the northeast and along most of the bar (except for its easternmost parts). For ages from 100 to 250 Myr the similarity to a tilted Θ persists, and star clusters now occupy the entire length of the bar. In the age range of 250 to 500 Myr, star clusters populate mostly the LMC bar, but many are also distributed along the western and northwestern LMC rim as well as in the northeast. 30 Dor and LMC 3 are now almost devoid of clusters, and very few are seen in LMC 4. At yet higher ages the concentration of clusters along the bar shows a pronounced decline (Glatt et al. 2010). These results demonstrate how massive star formation migrated with time across the disk and gradually propagated along the bar of the LMC.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7061/b706104ddab5801e1dd05c80067ed48968d95669" alt="The recent SFB of the LMC traced by its star clusters"
We used a subset of 307 age-dated clusters with masses > 5000 M⊙ and ages > 10 Myr in order to investigate the cluster age distribution and dissolution rate in the LMC (Baumgardt et al. 2013). We found the frequency of massive clusters to be roughly constant between 10 and 200 Myr. In other words, there is no significant influence of cluster dissolution for clusters younger than about 200 Myr, since both the ratio of the number of clusters to the absolute field star formation rate and the cluster mass function are independent of time for these clusters.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/575f6/575f6edbcd413c7a029820bdc5461fac5e7336e5" alt="LMC cluster dissolution: Cluster frequency vs. age"
For ages older than 200 Myr, the cluster frequency starts to drop. The ratio of cluster frequency to star formation rate is approximately a factor of 40 smaller at 4 Gyr than what it was at 200 Myr. Also, the cluster mass function exhibits a much shallower slope for clusters older than 1 Gyr. The number of missing clusters in our catalog needed to explain this flattening seems to be too large to be explained by incompleteness, suggesting that most of the flattening is due to cluster dissolution. In fact, for ages higher than 200 Myr about 90% of all clusters are lost per dex of lifetime (Baumgardt et al. 2013).
3.4 Young Massive Clusters in Star-Forming Galaxies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/61bbd/61bbdcb133fd53ca6e6559b36c8567e3d8382f9d" alt="Legacy ExtraGalactic UV Survey (LEGUS)"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e0065/e0065eafebfe60b54240b3857fd3b8beb940da8b" alt="LEGUS cluster age dating"
In the star-forming spiral galaxy NGC 628 we used 1392 cluster candidates younger than approximately 100 Myr to study their clustering properties via a two-point correlation function analysis (Grasha et al. 2015). We found that the strength of the clustering decreases with both increasing spatial scale and increasing age. For clusters older than 40 Myr we observe a pronounced decrease of the clustering strength - these clusters are largely randomly distributed. In terms of spatial scales, clusters beyond a scale length of about 160 pc show a fairly homogeneous distribution. Clusters with centrally concentrated light profiles ("compact clusters") tend to have the highest masses and oldest ages and show little clustering across all spatial scales, whereas extended, asymmetrical clusters ("associations") include those with the lowest average masses and youngest ages. They show the steepest clustering slopes. Generally though the mass of the star clusters turns out to have little effect on the clustering strength; it is primarily governed by age. Overall, the hierarchy in stellar aggregate clustering resembles that of the turbulent interstellar medium (Grasha et al. 2015).
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f93b9/f93b94d344775ccefeb95b58e83f43bb3de3f7a9" alt="NGC 628: Cluster age-mass diagram and clustering properties."
References
- Baumgardt, H., Parmentier, G., Anders, P., & Grebel, E.K. 2013, MNRAS, 430, 676
- Calzetti, D., Lee, J.C., Sabbi, E., Adamo, A., Smith, L.J., Andrews, J.E., Ubeda, L., Bright, S.N., Thilker, D., Aloisi, A., Brown, T.M., Chandar, R., Christian, C., Cignoni, M., Clayton, G.C., da Silva, R., de Mink, S., Dobbs, C., Elmegreen, B.G., Elmegreen, D.M., Evans, A.S., Fumagalli, M., Gallagher, J.S., Gouliermis, D.A., Grebel, E.K., et al. 2015a, AJ, 149, 51
- Calzetti, D., Johnson, K.E., Adamo, A., Gallagher, J.S., Andrews, J.E., Smith, L.J., Clayton, G.C., Lee, J.C., Sabbi, E., Ubeda, L., Kim, H., Ryon, J.E., Thilker, D., Bright, S.N., Zackrisson, E., Kennicutt, R.C., de Mink, S.E., Whitmore, B.C., Aloisi, A., Chandar, R., Cignoni, M., Cook, D., Dale, D.A., Elmegreen, B.G., Elmegreen, D.M., Evans, A.S., Fumagalli, M., Gouliermi, D.A., Grasha, K., Grebel, E.K., et al. 2015b, ApJ, 811, 75
- Da Costa, G.S., Grebel, E.K., Jerjen, H., Rejkuba, M., & Sharina, M.E. 2009, AJ, 137, 4361
- D'Abrusco, R., Cantiello, M., Paolillo, M., Pota, V., Napolitano, N.R., Limatola, L., Spavone, M., Grado, A., Iodice, E., Capaccioli, M., Peletier, R., Longo, G., Hilker, M., Mieske, S., Grebel, E.K., Lisker, T., Wittmann, C., van de Ven, G., & Fabbiano, G. 2016, ApJL, 819, L31
- Dirsch, B., Richtler, T., Geisler, D., Gebhardt, K., Hilker, M., Alonso, M.V., Forte, J.C., Grebel, E.K., Infante, L., Larsen, S., Minniti, D., & Rejkuba, M. 2004, AJ, 127, 2114
- Glatt, K., Gallagher, J.S., Grebel, E.K., Sabbi, E., Sirianni, M., Clementini, G., Tosi, M., Harbeck, D., Koch, A., & Cracraft, M. 2008, AJ, 135, 1106
- Glatt, K., Grebel, E.K., & Koch, A. 2010, A&A, 517, A50
- Gnedin, O.Y., & Ostriker, J.P. 1997, ApJ, 474, 223
- Grasha, K., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., Kim, H., Elmegreen, B.G., Gouliermis, D.A., Aloisi, A., Bright, S.N., Christian, C., Cignoni, M., Dale, D.A., Dobbs, C., Elmegreen, D.M., Fumagalli, M., Gallagher, J.S., Grebel, E.K., et al. 2015, ApJ, 815, 93
- Grebel, E.K. 2002, in Extragalactic Star Clusters, IAU Symp. 207, eds. D. Geisler, E.K. Grebel, & D. Minniti (ASP: San Francisco), p. 94
- Grebel, E.K. 2016, in Star Clusters and Black Holes in Galaxies across Cosmic Time, IAU Symp. 312, eds. Y. Meiron, S. Li, F.-K. Liu, & R. Spurzem (CUP: Cambridge), p. 157
- Grebel, E.K., & Gallagher, J.S. 2004, ApJL, 610, L89
- Harris, W.E., & van den Bergh 1981, AJ, 86, 1627
- Hodge, P.W. 1961, ApJ, 133, 413
- Hodge, P.W. 1962, PASP, 74, 248
- Jordán, A., et al. 2005, ApJ, 634, 1002
- Kissler, M., Richtler, T., Held, E.V., Grebel, E.K., Wagner, S.J., & Capaccioli, M. 1994, A&A, 287, 463
- Krumholz, M.R., Adamo, A., Fumagalli, M., et al. 2015, ApJ, 812, 147
- Parmentier, G., & Grebel, E.K. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 615
- Richtler, T., Grebel, E.K., Domgörgen, H., Hilker, M., & Kissler, M. 1992, A&A, 264, 25
- Richtler, T., Dirsch, B., Gebhardt, K., Geisler, D., Hilker, M., Alsonso, M.V., Forte, J.C., Grebel, E.K., Infante, L., Larsen, S., Minniti, D., & Rejkuba, M. 2004, AJ, 127, 2094
- van den Bergh, S., & Mackey, A.D. 2004, MNRAS, 345, 713
- van den Bergh, S., Morbey, C., & Pazder J. 1991, ApJ, 375, 594
- Wofford, A., Charlot, S., Bruzual, G., Eldridge, J.J., Calzetti, D., Adamo, A., Cignoni, M., de Mink, S.E., Gouliermis, D., Grasha, K., Grebel, E.K., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 4296
- Zaritsky, D., Harris, J., Thompson, I.B., Grebel, E.K., & Massey, P. 2002, AJ, 123, 855
- Zaritsky, D., Harris, J., Thompson, I.B., & Grebel, E.K. 2004, AJ, 128, 1606
Back to research overview